Why invest in competing for SEO rankings?
The reason to compete for SEO rankings is not that every website must reach first place. Rather, if a website aims to gain visibility, inquiries, and sales opportunities through search, improving its organic rankings can help potential customers find it. Whether the investment is worthwhile still depends on the target keywords, the level of competition, and whether the business can afford to produce content and wait for results. Rankings are a way to reach customers, not a revenue guarantee; building search traffic over the long term also requires ongoing effort.
Compete to be found, not just to rank higher
A 2022 article by Welly notes that organic search results generally receive higher click-through rates when they rank higher, and lists visibility, inquiries, and sales opportunities as benefits of improved rankings. This offers a reason to compete: if a website’s content matches the products or services users are looking for, improving its visibility may bring searchers to the site.
However, visibility, clicks, and completed sales are different stages. An article on SEO return on investment on Neil Patel’s website also emphasizes the need to measure how traffic translates into revenue and to understand customer needs. Before investing, clarify whether the goal is to increase product views, service inquiries, or sales, rather than simply chasing ranking positions.
Organic visibility is worth building, but the traffic is not free
Welly’s article presents SEO as a long-term marketing option: when paid advertising stops running, the visibility it provides also stops; organic search, by contrast, does not require paying Google for an organic ranking. This distinction between the two ways of gaining visibility does not mean SEO is cheaper than advertising for every website.
A 2023 article on Neil Patel’s website cautions that SEO requires time and attention, and meaningful results may take months or even years. It also involves challenges such as changing costs, delayed results, and complex measurement. If short-term results are needed, rankings that have yet to materialize cannot be treated as guaranteed revenue.
Targeting the right search needs matters more than chasing broad keywords
In a keyword research example provided by Semrush, “help desk software” had a difficulty score of 52, while “help desk software for small business,” which targets small businesses, scored 21. These were the results of that particular study, not permanent scores, but they illustrate how competition can begin with the more specific needs of a target audience.
- When resources are limited, consider niche search terms that match the services offered, rather than focusing solely on broad terms.
- The original article also suggests possible avenues such as video, AI citations, and forums; organic rankings are not the only way to reach an audience interested in the same topic.
Marketplaces also need to help sellers improve their content
For multi-seller marketplaces, SEO involves more than the rankings of individual pages. Semrush’s article on marketplaces notes that teaching sellers to optimize product information can help maintain a consistently high-quality experience, increase visibility for products and the marketplace, and improve their ability to compete for rankings against similar products. Practical investments might include guidance on product descriptions, keyword research, and image alt text, linking ranking efforts to the quality of the information the website actually provides.
Competing for SEO rankings: perspectives from across the web
Do different industries need to invest the same amount of resources in SEO?
Not necessarily. Start by researching keyword difficulty in the relevant market. In Semrush's sample covering five U.S. industries, 63% of finance keywords were moderately difficult and only 18% had low difficulty; in the e-commerce sample, 48% had low difficulty. This suggests that opportunities to gain a foothold may vary by industry, but the sample results cannot be taken as directly representative of competition in every region or for every website.
Is brand image also a reason to compete for rankings?
If a website wants to introduce its brand to searchers, brand image can be a consideration. Welly's article argues that improving Google rankings may not only increase visibility and traffic but also help establish a professional image, laying the groundwork for subsequent brand marketing. However, these are benefits proposed by the article, not a guarantee that higher rankings will improve brand image.
Is SEO still worth considering as AI search grows?
It remains worth considering, but the supplied material is insufficient to determine AI's long-term impact on SEO. The person posing the question on Warrior Forum suggests that growing use of AI search could lead to SEO's decline; an alternative view is that AI needs to obtain information from websites. The latter does not establish that website rankings necessarily determine AI citations, so neither argument should be treated as a firm conclusion.
References
- Is SEO going to be giving diminishing returns?www.warriorforum.com — Discusses: Is SEO still worth considering as AI search grows?
- A Guide to Keyword Competition in SEO & PPC [2025 Data]www.semrush.com · 2024-10-07T09:34:00Z — Discusses: Do different industries need to invest the same amount of resources in SEO?
- Google SEO重要嗎?不投Ads就能帶來更多流量與訂單!welly.tw · 2022-07-25T07:24:37.731Z — Discusses: Is brand image also a reason to compete for rankings?
- SEO strategy in 2026: how to build one (+ free workbook)www.semrush.com · 2022-03-07T12:30:00Z — Source used in the article above.
- Marketplace SEO: How to Optimize Your Online Platformwww.semrush.com · 2024-05-29T09:29:00Z — Source used in the article above.
- What is SEO ROI, & How Do You Measure It?neilpatel.com · 2023-02-12T20:00:00+00:00 — Source used in the article above.


Join the discussion 0 comments
What are you working through? Share a question or experience and let’s find the next step.
No comments yet. Start the conversation.